<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Portmanager on bramp.net</title>
    <link>https://blog.bramp.net/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Portmanager on bramp.net</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-GB</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.bramp.net/tags/portmanager/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <item>
      <title>Updating…/-\|/-|</title>
      <link>https://blog.bramp.net/post/2009/12/19/updating-%5C/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://blog.bramp.net/post/2009/12/19/updating-%5C/</guid>
      <description><p>Do people other than me find updating their servers to be relaxing? At every opportunity I run “apt-get update”. Today I’m updating 7 different machines simultaneously.</p>
<p>My Debian machines I simply issue the following commands:</p>
<div class="highlight"><pre tabindex="0" class="chroma"><code class="language-bash" data-lang="bash"><span class="line"><span class="cl">apt-get update
</span></span><span class="line"><span class="cl">apt-get upgrade
</span></span></code></pre></div><p>My FreeBSD machines:</p>
<div class="highlight"><pre tabindex="0" class="chroma"><code class="language-bash" data-lang="bash"><span class="line"><span class="cl">portsnap fetch update
</span></span><span class="line"><span class="cl">portmanager -u
</span></span></code></pre></div><p>I think the Debian process is easier (and clearly the fastest) but it obviously has to do less work because I’m downloading precompiled code. Portmanager is just as easy but seems to randomly ask me questions through the process whereas apt-get seems to get them out of the way early on. Either way I find this all very easy and relaxing… until I have to reboot the machines and find something is broken :/</p>
</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
